Skip to content

Modular Design: The Software, The Process, The Future

Anthony Gude is the Director of Operations at R & S Tavares Associates, a company based in San Diego, California. Founded in 2002 by Ralph and Silvana Tavares, the firm provides services that include design, structural engineering, consulting, and project management for construction clients across the United States. Most of the company’s work involves designing and engineering pre-fabricated buildings.

Early design

Anthony Gude emphasizes the familiar advice to bring all the key players on a project together early in the design process. “Everyone says this — because it’s true!” Gude says. “Nobody has all the necessary information at the start, especially on innovative or large-scale projects. A conference call with 20 or 30 people giving input at the pre-design stage is not uncommon.

”There will be numerous design iterations while the team explores project feasibility and it’s important to remain flexible during this process. “Re-designs — such as designing a whole building in steel and then re-designing in wood, or vice versa — often happen because someone was pulling in a particular direction too soon,” Gude says. “So have that group discussion first, and get all the information and constraints on the table from the beginning.”

If the design team is brought in too late, or if the wrong fabricator is chosen for a project, “then you’re setting yourself up for failure.”


Processes vs execution

Speaking of failures, Gude says that when modular construction has been criticized for poor outcomes, it’s often been without considering the causes of those outcomes. “We need to distinguish between the processes of modular design and construction on the one hand, and the execution of those processes on the other. Problems executing the processes can result in poor outcomes — that doesn’t mean there’s something wrong with the processes themselves,” Gude says. “It’s like someone failing to reach their destination on a bicycle because they fell off. That poor outcome doesn’t mean there’s something inherently wrong with the process of bicycle-riding. It means that, on that occasion, there was a problem with executing that process.”

It’s particularly important to make sure everyone on the team for a project is well-suited to it. For example, an owner might require a large cantilevered deck on the top floor of a building. A specific fabricator may be better suited to design and custom-manufacture that building because they’re experienced with the details of the required connections. However, if the owner has contracted with a fabricator who doesn’t have that experience, “then the project may not be able to overcome the design constraint due to the mis-match in capabilities. The shortcoming in this case is not in the modular design and manufacturing processes themselves — but rather it’s due to the specific decisions of those leading the project.”

Similarly, start-up ventures may lack the right kind of knowledge and experience. They might have a type of end product in mind, but have a mismatch with the type of fabrication or material they want to use. “For example, shipping containers are not suitable for every type of end product,” Gude says. “There comes a point where you have to do so much re-work or structural re-design of containers that the project team should have used one of the other solutions available to the volumetric modular industry.”


Photo credit: KTGY Architects

Related Listening:
How Owner/Developers Can Best Get Started with Modular Construction w/ R & S Tavares Associates

In this episode, Pedro Tavares and Anthony Gude of R & S Tavares Associates share best practices for owner/developers looking to incorporate modular construction into their upcoming projects.

Listen to more podcasts here.

Re-using design elements

A major advantage of modular construction is the ability to re-use design elements on multiple projects, thus reducing costs. R & S Tavares recently put this into practice on the HOPE projects, which are supportive housing developments in the greater Los Angeles area.

These developments have been sponsored and supported by local governments that are committed to a longer pipeline — not just one or two projects. This means the entire design and construction team can also commit to multiple projects and deliver on modular’s promise of more economical housing. “Because the team was invested in multiple projects, we developed core designs that could be reconfigured in a variety of ways to best suit each individual project,” says Gude.

Design software

Gude mentions some software products, such as Archistar, Hypar, and Kreo, which “help with everything from site feasibility, all the way through to parametric design and modeling.” These kinds of software create renderings based on “the general parameters of the building — how the modules connect, the type of building, the number of stories, wind loads, snow loads, etc.”

R & S Tavares is working on a portal where clients can pick from a library of pre-designed elements and, combined with the input of high-level design constraints, the software will render a rough draft model to use as a basis for early discussions. The rough draft functions like an initial feasibility study for the client.

“With this technology, we can effectively download our early project feasibility decision tree, and have an algorithm make those assumptions for us,” says Gude. “And then we can do the detailed design based on the resulting draft model — instead of investing time and effort into a detailed design that it turns out later the client isn’t on board with.”

Sharable digitized designs

Gude says sharable digitized designs will help move modular construction towards truly industrialized design and manufacturing, making the industry more efficient and reducing costs. He says modular fabrication is not yet homogenous enough to share designs widely and he predicts that, first, “engineering firms that specialize in fabrication and manufacturing will learn to own and distribute their design details as digital products.”

One problem with sharing digitized designs is that the original designer can lose control of the design. “Illegal use of design details is rampant the architecture, engineering, and construction industries,” Gude says.

The solution lies with technology-enabled ledgers, Gude explains. This allows code to serve like a unique barcode that attachs to a digital product, which acts like a certificate of authenticity. These certificates can guarantee that the original designer will reap some benefit every time someone acquires a copy of the design — like royalties going to an author every time a copy of their e-book is sold.

“All the technology for this already exists,” Gude says. “As it becomes more widely adopted, it’ll be a game-changer for permitting and design workflows. It will allow us all to maximize the benefit of modularization and industrial design in construction.”

This article was first published in the Modular Advantage - May/June 2021 Edition.

About the Author: Zena Ryder is a freelance writer, specializing in writing about construction and for construction companies. You can find her at Zena, Freelance Writer or on LinkedIn.

More from Modular Advantage

Inside the Construction of 355 Sango Court

This year’s winner for Best of Show for Permanent Structures is 355 Sango Court, a 105,818 square foot affordable housing development manufactured by Nampa, Idaho based Autovol. The project team also included Prefab Logic for module design, Nibbi Brothers as the general contractor, Acc U Set Construction as the modular installer, and the overall project design was by David Baker Architects and DCI and Fard.

Aster Place by ROC Modular

Aster Place, a supportive housing building in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, won the Best of Show Award and Honorable Mention for relocatable structures in the social and supportive housing category at this year’s World of Modular conference.

Looking Back at the 2024 World of Modular

On March 18-21, the Modular Building Institute presented its 41st annual
convention and tradeshow, hosted again at the luxurious the Rosen Shingle Creek in Orlando, FL. Nearly 1,500 attendees from around the world gathered to learn, network, and find ways to expand both their businesses and the industry at-large.

Touring Japan’s Offsite Construction Industry: An Interview with James Haas, Offsite Construction Sales Manager for Nichiha

Nichiha USA, a premier provider of building envelope solutions and member of the Modular Building Institute (MBI), recently partnered with MBI for a trip to Japan to visit the Nichiha home office in Nagoya as well as several other offsite manufacturers around the country. Besides learning about different offsite building methodologies and systems, the trip was an excellent chance for both MBI and Nichiha to create closer ties with potential industry partners in Japan.

Modular Multi-family Construction: A Field Study of Energy Code Compliance and Performance through Offsite Prefabrication

Prefabrication in a factory setting may improve the performance of modular buildings compared to traditional site-built buildings. To validate this premise, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) funded a 3-year study from 2020-2023 comparing the energy performance of more than 50 modular and site-built multifamily buildings under construction in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Philadelphia and Seattle.

Inflation Comes in Hot to Begin ’24

Last year was a shockingly good one for the U.S. economy, at least relative to expectations. Coming into 2023, the conventional wisdom was that near-term recession was inevitable in America. In the face of belligerent excess inflation (above the Federal Reserve’s 2 percent mandate), monetary policymakers began ratcheting interest rates higher in March 2022. That process continued throughout the balance of the year and into 2023.

A Huge Win for the Modular Construction Industry in Massachusetts

In early February, 2024, the Massachusetts Board of Building Regulations and Standards (BBRS) released its proposed 10th Edition building codes. This draft included several amendments targeting modular construction that would have created an extremely difficult environment for the entire modular industry and could have eliminated the industry entirely in the state.

FEMA Announces Hawaii Housing Plan Using Modular Construction

Utah becomes the second state in the country, following Virginia, to fully adopt ICC/MBI standards 1200 and 1205. MBI will continue to work with leadership in Utah to implement the new program.

Supply and Demand: Solving Canada’s Housing Crisis One Relocatable Housing Unit at a Time

Not only do Moda Modular’s repurposed employee housing solutions cut the emissions related to construction down to nearly zero, but they also keep building materials that are often not biodegradable from slowly decaying in storage facilities.
It’s the classic environmental mantra of reduce, reuse, and recycle, scaled up and applied to building after building.

ICC/MBI Standards 1200 & 1205 Provide Foundation for Utah’s First-Ever State Modular Program

Utah becomes the second state in the country, following Virginia, to fully adopt ICC/MBI standards 1200 and 1205. MBI will continue to work with leadership in Utah to implement the new program.