Modular Multi-family Construction: A Field Study of Energy Code Compliance and Performance through Offsite Prefabrication
Kevin Grosskopf is a professor at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Prefabrication in a factory setting may improve the performance of modular buildings compared to traditional site-built buildings. To validate this premise, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) funded a 3-year study from 2020-2023 comparing the energy performance of more than 50 modular and site-built multifamily buildings under construction in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Philadelphia and Seattle. In addition to energy performance, DOE was also interested in the potential cost savings of modular construction as well as other market opportunities and challenges.
Crane set at a modular jobsite (VBC), Philadelphia PA, 2022. 260,000 sq. ft. mixed-use project consisting of 5-stories and 410 residential modular units over 2-stories of site-built commercial podium.
Part I - Energy Performance
Multifamily buildings selected for this study averaged 6 stories, 140,390 sq. ft. square-feet and 144 units. Data was collected on several energy-related material and equipment systems. Data collection for each project began with a plan review followed by two field inspections. For modular projects, the first inspection was conducted at the factory and a second inspection was conducted at the construction site. Findings indicate that the performance of key energy-related materials and equipment in modular multifamily construction was somewhat better than those found in site-built, particularly in climate zones 3 (Los Angeles and San Francisco).
The DOE study also looked at the post-occupancy energy performance of another 20 modular multifamily buildings completed between 2013-2022 in these same areas. While there appeared to be little difference between the annual energy use in modular multifamily buildings (36.0 kBtu/sq. ft./yr) compared to more than 120 site-built buildings (35.8 kBtu/sq. ft./yr), ENERGY STAR™ scores for modular (86) were higher on average compared to site-built (81).
Given that most of the modular buildings in this study were affordable housing, apartment units were smaller on average (560 sq. ft.) compared to site-built units (830 sq. ft.). As a result, occupant density in modular multifamily buildings was 30-50% higher. When normalized for this, the energy performance of modular multifamily construction is likely (much) better than site-built. Although few differences were observed between the types of materials and equipment used in either modular or site-built multifamily construction, installation quality appeared to be significantly better in modular.
Part II - Market Opportunities & Challenges
During factory and construction site inspections, interviews were conducted with project stakeholders to identify key market implementation opportunities and challenges. Findings suggest that the most significant advantage of modular construction is schedule savings. Offsite prefabrication can proceed simultaneously with onsite construction, reducing time, project overhead and the impact of weather. Overall, modular buildings in this study were completed 25-30% faster on average when compared to site-built buildings. Despite added transportation costs, modular construction ($243/sq. ft.) was also found to be cost-competitive with site-built construction ($251/sq. ft.), particularly when considering shortened construction schedules and speed to market.
Yet, persistent barriers to modular market growth remain, including a building industry that is unwilling to change from traditional site-built methods, consideration of modular too late in the design process, lack of modular industry standards, and the risks associated with modular builders as a very large suppliers or subcontractors in the design-bid-build delivery process.
To address these issues, some manufacturers have undertaken a greater role in the design-manufacture-construct process. Specifically, manufacturers have begun to offer ‘turn-key’ building solutions by providing design, manufacturing and construction services in-house. By doing so, a commitment to modular is made at the beginning of the project, saving time and money. The inefficient, even adversarial relationship between designers, manufacturers, and site contractors is replaced with a single, fixed-price contract between developer and manufacturer before production begins. Profits are tied to overall project performance, not to the performance of individual players in the traditional design-bid-build process.
Production line at a modular factory (Nashua Builders), Nampa ID, 2023.
Conclusion
With greater control over the project design, as well as the number and timing of projects undertaken, modular manufacturers in the design-manufacture-construct process can better achieve product standardization within their factories and sustain production between project cycles. In doing so, factories can be operated more efficiently with less worker turnover.
Download the Complete Report
Download a complete copy of Kevin Grosskopf's 2023 report "Modular Multi-family Construction: A Field Study of Energy Code Compliance and Performance through Offsite Prefabrication"
More from Modular Advantage
From Amsterdam to Brussels: How MBI Is Strengthening Europe’s Modular Construction Voice
By the end of 2026 MBI’s Government Affairs team will have traveled over 6,000 air miles to bring Town Hall events to five different cities in two countries.
From Model to Machine: Why Modular Scale Is Becoming a Software Problem, not a Material One
For modular manufacturers that have already secured demand and repeatable volume, the next major constraint may no longer be forming capacity itself. Increasingly, it is the continuity of the information feeding that capacity.
Who Will Define Modular Products for AI?
Artificial intelligence is making building configurators easier and less expensive to create. This makes urgent manufacturers’ need portable product definitions, stable identities, and shared interfaces regardless of how others’ software is produced.
From BIM to Robotic Production: A Digital Workflow for Customized Components in Volumetric Modular Construction
For volumetric modular manufacturers, the value of this workflow is not simply the use of robotics. Its real value is continuity.
Helping Build a Common Framework for Modular Construction in Canada
Canada’s modular construction sector continues to gain momentum, but scaling it successfully will depend on shared expectations across design, manufacturing, approvals, and project delivery. CSA Z251 helps provide that common foundation.
Edges, Exits & Equipment: A Modular Builder’s Guide to Rooftop Access
Rooftop access belongs in the factory design. Before the modules ship, the project team should identify each route’s users, confirm applicable requirements, coordinate with the roof system and structure, and assign responsibility.
When Timber Production and Modular Construction Share One System
As demand for multifamily and workforce housing continues to outpace what conventional construction timelines can deliver, models that reduce the number of handoffs between structural fabrication and modular assembly are likely to draw more attention.
Your AI Strategy Is an Enablement Strategy
Tools will change. Teaching employees only the steps in one platform creates a narrow capability. Involving them in problem definition, process mapping, data assessment, controls, and measurement gives the organization a way to improve its systems as technology evolves.
By-Right Permitting: The Missing Lever for Scaling Modular Multifamily
Modular has already proven it can outperform traditional building methods on speed and cost per unit. The next frontier is outside the factory in the front end of the process, where projects either clear a path to construction or get stuck in review.
Remote Inspections and The Future of Factory Oversight
Remote inspection is becoming a practical part of modular construction oversight. Its value is greatest when it is used selectively, governed by clear procedures, and supported by complete traceability.