Skip to content

MBI Issues Policy Position on Tariffs & Their Impact on Modular Construction. Read the statement here.

State of Modular in 2025: Facing Reality

Jennifer Castenson

Jennifer Castenson is a VP of Public Relations at BUILDXACT.

It is time for the U.S. modular industry to face some harsh realities and embrace some positive momentum.

Advocates for modular have been talking about cost savings, time savings, higher quality, and sustainability. While all of those are true on different projects and at different scales, it’s not consistent enough to be real.

Reality One: Laboring Over Labor

Many modular projects have documented time savings from a labor perspective, whether from a reduced number of required workers or from the time of labor or both, which could result in cost savings. However, the reality is that onsite construction relies on a different and unique workforce that has fewer requirements and regulations than an offsite workforce.

Sean Dobson, CEO at Amherst, recently presented at the Industrialized Housing Summit, giving his perspective from a company that has both site-built homes and offsite built homes. The volumetric modular arm of his business, StudioBuilt by Amherst, operates out of a 360,000-square-foot facility in Texas. He humbly discussed the discovery process comparing operations of both side by side, the failures and the wins.

“It’s pure fiction that you can build cheaper in a factory than on site,” he said. “All people who work in the factory get benefits, but the competition doesn’t have to offer any of that. Modular has a huge cost disadvantage in labor. You cannot run a factory with OSHA and all the things required for a business and compete with the traditional construction labor pool that doesn’t collect benefits.”

Despite the higher cost of labor, Dobson admits that he would take an offsite build over onsite any day because the lack of quality control on an onsite project. With the higher quality, the insurance costs and risk of issues are lowered with offsite.

“Homes built on site show glitz and glamour but a lot of bad design choices,” he said.

Since offsite boosts the quality and the design, Rommel Sulit, principal and founder at Forge Craft, has found a great application for it with subsidized affordable housing projects that are very process oriented.

“There are already synergies because offsite and affordable housing are both very process oriented,” he said. “You have to qualify for all the funding, build for resiliency, and then you can aggregate that value into the modular boxes. From the labor side, the prevailing wage mandate goes away.”

0503-EDIT-1-(1)-(1)-1_1200x900

Reality Two: Localization is Key

Another stark reality for the industry is that federal funding for innovative housing solutions is disappearing. Bobby Vance, who is an assistant professor at the Virginia Tech School of Architecture and also serves as the co-director of the Housing Innovation Challenge, said that this trend is driving more partnerships between the industry and research institutions.

“From a trend perspective, we are looking at smaller homes and working to understand how to use offsite for a speed advantage to create what the starter home looks like,” Vance said. “It doesn’t have to be a rental property or an apartment but how do we scale down for someone to purchase in their 20s.”

Another aspect of the strength of localization is a trend toward micro factories that get the production of homes closer to population centers. Brian Gaudio is the CEO at Pittsburgh-based Module, and is developing design, construction, and manufacturing assets to grow an ecosystem of last-mile facilities with a low capex start that create local jobs and that can produce 50 homes per year.

Module is offering turnkey services for developers to increase its revenue per housing unit, another aspect that makes the localization appealing to developers – they want to keep the economic boost local.

Alex Horowitz serves as the director of the Housing Policy Initiative at The Pew Charitable Trusts and sees local code improvements that are making a big distance. For example, Colorado developed a program to lure modular manufacturers to the state because transportation costs from outside the state were too high factoring in the commute through the Rocky Mountains.

Overall, Colorado’s and other local codes have helped move modular a couple steps forward. Horowitz notes that there are other states and localities that have created legislative packages to change zoning and land use laws to make housing developments faster and easier, while removing rules that discourage density and residential development.

He also notes the value of states opening up inspections to third party reviewers to help expedite the process. Some states are creating pre-approved plans that allow consistency and predictability rather than all new being custom, which is another generous step forward.
While there has been local progress, Dobson from Amherst is continually surprised by how much push back volumetric gets from the local markets it is serving, where cities and counties refuse permits.

Reality Three: More Intangibles

We spend about $901 billion annually on private residential construction in the U.S. according to the U.S. Census Bureau, and workforce management platform Rhumbix calculates that we add 10 to 25% to the total contract values with change orders.

Sean Shields is the director of marketing at the Structural Building Components Association and says that reducing change orders is just one of many hidden benefits of doing modular construction.

In doing work with national homebuilder Taylor Morrison, he was able to show how opportunity costs and costs associated with precision and quality, were able to translate to the builder.

During the Industrialized Housing Summit, he shared that Taylor Morrison started producing a floorplan offsite that it had stick built 500 times and was able to save time in framing and MEP installation. The delays that typically occurred onsite didn’t occur in the factory because the house was to built to specification, and because it was built to specification, was able to pass inspection the first time.

0657-EDIT-1-(1)-(1)-1_1200x799

“They were able to get at a 16% increase moving to offsite on first glance,” Shields said. “Looking at the back end it was a more cost-efficient solution—the downstream benefits spoke to them to change processes.”

So, this reality is that everything needs to be tracked because sometimes the improvements and the savings aren’t the things that are obvious.

“Now’s the time for the industry to say we can do this and not rely on the government and make better decisions on our own,” he said.
“We are trying to say we can take this on and give it as a template to production builders, and it doesn’t have to be the federal government to come in so that the home can remain safe and operational. It is the industry’s time to shine, and regardless of who is in power, the government is not being helpful, so we can take matters into our own hands.”

As a step further from federal support, his work on the Housing Innovation Challenge is focusing on creating designs for completely grid-independent homes that can separate from an instable grid so the home can remain functional even with the current increase in storm activity.

Reality Four: On Site is Under Threat

Japanese building companies have been moving to the U.S. to acquire homebuilders and convert them to a more efficient offsite building process. Ken Pinto, a supply chain consultant at Kenzai USA, said that the current reality for onsite builders is that they should feel threatened by offsite.

“The Japanese are continuing with acquisitions, they have the money and the experience and are already in the top five builders in the U.S.,” he said. “The Japanese are successful because they are using vertical integration, and they own the lumber supply chain. Plus, they have been doing offsite for more than 40 years. They changed scheduling increments from days to hours and brought precision and technique.”

These formulas are key to the future of home building in the U.S. as labor and supply challenges persist and will be the only way to survive financially.

Robin Bartram Brown brought his modular business, MMY US, to Louisville, Kentucky, from the U.K. He targeted the area as an intermodal hub as a strong location to design, manufacture and deliver smarter, more affordable homes using cold-formed steel frames.

He’s also presenting a threat to the local onsite builders by providing a faster, stronger building system that can meet the needs of affordable and infill housing at a much more competitive price point and helping local leaders navigate codes and regulation to continue to improve the process.

Wrapping It Up & Moving Modular Forward

The critical and urgent reality is that the modular industry needs to open the doors to collaboration across all sectors, across all dynamics, and embrace new ideas to be successful in offsite in the United States.

“No one wants to share secrets, but they complain that there is no way to standardize the process,” said Forge Craft’s Sulit. “There are growing pains, and some realize they aren’t being consistent in their thinking. Everyone deserves a fair crack at succeeding in this business. Don’t assume you can’t go down a road because no none has been successful here in the past, because maybe you are the one.”

The sooner we stare down these challenges, the sooner we can welcome a new reality where modular is the dominant way to deliver housing for better performance, quality and all at a lower cost.

More from Modular Advantage

Resia: Breaking All the Rules

Resia Manufacturing, a division of U.S.-based Resia, is now offering prefabricated bathroom and kitchen components to industry partners. Its hybrid fabrication facility produces more precise bathroom and kitchen components (modules) faster and at lower cost than traditional construction. Here’s how Resia Manufacturing does it.

How LINQ Modular Innovates to Bring Modular To The Market in the UAE and Beyond

LINQ Modular, with an office and three manufacturing facilities in Dubai, is a modular firm based in United Arab Emirates. The company is on a mission: to break open the housing and construction markets in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) area with modular.

ModMax: Redefining Modular Construction with Confidence and Precision

ModMax was born out of frustration—frustration with five persistent pain points in modular construction: Permitting bottlenecks. Production delays. Rigid designs. Disconnect between “the office” and the field. Lack of transparency and communication.

LifeArk: Disaster-Resilient Housing from Recycled Plastic and 100-year-old Technology

Wee compares LifeArk’s housing units to Yeti coolers, as they are built similarly. Each component takes 15 to 20 minutes to manufacture, has an R-value of 40, and includes molded slots and chases for wiring, plumbing, fire sprinklers, and other utilities.

Building the Future of Modular Edge Infrastructure

The edge data center market is expanding rapidly, driven by the surge in AI workloads, IoT adoption, and the need for localized compute power. In these environments, sustainability, scalability, and reliability are non-negotiable. Cooling is among the most complex challenges for operators—and one of the most decisive factors in long-term success.

Accelerating Light-Gauge Steel Construction: A Semi-Automated Digital Workflow for Off-Site Projects

For construction professionals, the message is clear. By adopting semi-automation and digitalization, companies can deliver projects faster, more accurately, and more profitably, while also building stronger collaboration across teams. The approach is not about replacing people with machines, but about empowering people with better tools and processes.

Why Modular Data Centers Are Gaining Momentum

Artificial intelligence, high-performance computing, and edge applications push the limits of traditional “stick-built” data centers. They take years build, often struggle with high density workloads, and aren’t optimized for deployments near end users. Modular data center platforms are purpose-built to address these challenges, offering flexibility and scalability to adapt to evolving technologies, while opening new opportunities for the modular construction industry.

Supply Chain Innovation in Action: 5 Habits Every Modular Leader Should Practice

By applying these principles to supply chain practices — collaborative planning, strategic procurement, scenario modeling, digital tools, and transparent forecasting — construction leaders can build value chains that are not just efficient and agile, but truly innovative.

Exploring the Role of Modular Integrated Construction (MiC) in Advancing Circular City Principles – A Survey of Stakeholder Perspectives

The survey findings highlight the significant potential of Modular integrated Construction (MiC) in advancing the development of circular cities. By reducing costs, accelerating construction timelines, and minimizing waste generation, MiC offers a promising approach to sustainable urban development.

The Use of MS POLYMER™-Based Sealants and Adhesives in Modular Building

These products combine flexibility and elastic recovery with excellent adhesion to different substrates and have already shown their usefulness in traditional construction. Now it’s time for them to be put to use in the modular construction industry.