Study Quantifies Modular's Wood Waste Savings
A recent study commissioned by MBI and carried out at Colorado State University shows that when it comes to optimizing the circular economics of a construction project, modular is the preferred way to build (when compared to traditional ground-up framing techniques). Now, this isn’t new information for those in the modular community. The very nature of using modular construction techniques is that there is less material waste. But this new study will help quantify that savings.
Killingsworth’s research compared the raw weight of lumber removed from the job site (roll-off weight of dumpsters processed by the waste hauler) with the wood waste created at the modular plant. Those amounts were then divided by the square footage and the total wall height of each project to come up with an average amount of waste.
The study compared the wood waste (in weight) created by two multifamily projects, one using modular construction and the other
traditional stick building. It then calculated the amount of wood waste created by framing activities when compared to both the square
footage and the wall height of each project. This was done in order to provide a consistent comparison, as the ceiling heights on the stick-built project varied.
The research team made several visits to the stick-built site to ensure that wood waste was being properly sorted. At times they found
additional materials and refuse in the wood waste dumpster, so they continued to monitor sorting throughout the project. They also visited the modular manufacturing plant, which had just instituted a waste sorting and reduction process, and confirmed that the process was being followed. Because the process was being followed so closely at the plant, they didn’t revisit it as often.
The results, which will be released at MBI’s 2024 World of Modular, show that modular construction does a better job of keeping wood waste out of the landfills. The research compared the raw weight of lumber removed from the job site (roll-off weight of dumpsters processed by the waste hauler) with the wood waste created at the modular plant. Those amounts were then divided by the square footage and the total wall height of each project to come up with an average amount of waste.
When asked if he was surprised by this result, John Killingsworth, associate professor in the construction management program at CSU, said no. “To be a good scientist you want to be unbiased and have an open mind to accept whatever the data says, and we were. We took two measurements, square footage and ceiling height, to ensure that the data is compared equally. But, no, I wasn’t really surprised.”
The results stand even though modular construction uses more overall lumber than stick framing.
By its nature, modular multifamily developments have twice the ceilings, floors, and walls as stick framing. This is one of the major advantages of using modular, as it reduces noise transmission, leading to quieter living spaces.
The wood waste study was primarily backed by MBI with some assistance from the university. Killingsworth hopes modular construction companies and designers will use this data to market the advantages of modular construction and help grow its market share.
Killingsworth comes to his teaching role with a background in the trades. He worked in the field for 16 years and gained skills in both project management and site management, before going back to school to get his advanced degree. After earning his PhD at the University of Nebraska, he taught in Wisconsin for a few years before moving to Colorado State University.
He is no stranger to modular construction or construction research. During his time in Nebraska, he worked under a Department of Labor grant to provide workforce development focused on modular construction. Then, after he moved to Colorado, he participated in a Department of Energy grant-funded study that compared the energy performance of traditional stick-built multifamily construction with modular, specifically in areas where energy codes are strict (California, Pennsylvania, and Seattle, Washington). The final results of this study, which will be released soon, show that modular performed better. And the relationships with modular builders that were created in that study were leveraged in the recent MBI study on wood waste.
Killingsworth uses his early experiences in the field to give his students context to what they’re learning. The construction program at CSU focuses on the dynamics of construction management at many levels, including superintendent, project manager, and during preconstruction. Topics include estimating, scheduling, contracts, quantity take offs, BIM tools, and construction finance. Students are required to complete two summer internships, which gives them more exposure to the real world and helps with job prospects. The majority of CSU graduates will go into commercial construction management, whether for general contractors or trade contractors.
As far as future research is concerned, Killingsworth hopes that the industry will look at the potential waste savings for other building materials, like steel, or product packaging, like cardboard and Styrofoam. He’d also like to see the industry study the labor savings of modular versus traditional construction. “We don’t really have any empirical data to speak to that. And if we’re going to have a true conversation on circular economics, it’s not just materials, but we’ve got to look at labor efficiencies and the financial impact.”
“We can argue about the improved quality of modular construction, the better energy performance, the lower environmental impact, and the reduced waste, and those are easy arguments to win. But ultimately, if the owner can’t make as much money, then it’s difficult to change their mind. So that’s why I would love to be able to specifically say modular construction is actually equal to or less expensive than traditional construction when you consider the time value of money and lifecycle costs.”
Killingworth intends to use his upcoming sabbatical next year to dive into more specific research on circular economics and construction. A circular economy looks to keep products and materials in service for as long as possible. It focuses on reducing material use, redesigning materials and products to be less resource intensive, and recapturing waste as a resource to manufacture new materials and products. In 2009, the EPA and other federal government agencies adopted a sustainable materials management approach that embraces circularity. The ultimate goal is to transform how we view and handle natural resources, materials and products, and waste. Their vision is a waste management system that is inclusive, more equitable, and reflects the urgency of the climate crisis. Modular construction can be at the forefront of this vision.
Only at World of Modular:
Waste Reduction Practices in Multifamily Construction
John Killingsworth, Associate Professor, Department of Construction Management, Colorado State University
Modular, offsite, and prefabrication practices are growing at a faster pace than traditional construction methods because these innovative solutions address concerns around workforce limitations, material supply-chain, safety, and quality. Past research efforts have typically focused on the qualitative rather than quantitative aspects of modular construction. This research gap provides an opportunity to leverage existing relationships with developer and modular communities to truly measure the quantitative benefits of offsite construction.
Colorado State University has completed a comparative study seeking to specifically measure framing material waste produced during a traditional site-built multifamily project and a modular offsite-built multifamily project. This comprehensive research outlines the significant limitations that exist in traditional building and waste management systems, and the increasing advantages that modular construction practices have in these processes. The research will provide actionable data for modular construction experts and novices alike.
About the Author: Dawn Killough is a freelance construction writer with over 25 years of experience working with construction companies, subcontractors and general contractors. Her published work can be found at dkilloughwriter.com.
More from Modular Advantage
Mind the Gap: The Interface Between Onsite and Offsite Construction
Every design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) project — modular, mass timber, or panelized — is really two projects joined at a seam. One is built in a controlled factory to millimeter tolerances; the other in the field, in weather, to the looser tolerances of poured concrete and human hands. Between them sits an interface: where the factory’s precision meets the site’s reality.
Rules, Rails & Repeatability: Applying DfMA to Modular Healthcare
DfMA offers several advantages for healthcare projects, with faster delivery among the most valuable. Schedule matters when building new facilities, expanding campuses, renovating existing space or bringing care closer to communities that need it.
Precision and Possibility: Demands of DfMA and What Modular Mass Timber Makes Possible
Mass timber does not automatically create an efficient modular building. Its precision makes early coordination more important: fabricated components will accurately reproduce both the team’s solutions and its mistakes. The material’s advantages are realized only when supported by an equally precise design and delivery process.
Catch It in the Factory, Not in the Field: Smarter Testing for Modular Builds
Integrating watertightness and airtightness testing into factory workflows transforms quality assurance from a reactive process into a proactive commissioning strategy. It ensures that every module shipped is field ready and resilient for transportation while also supporting the ability of the modular construction industry to make buildings better.
Modular Construction Contracts: Key Considerations for Successful Canadian Projects
Starting a modular project with a well-developed contract protects both the owner and the contractor. It will help keep the project on track and on budget, and it will improve quality from the factory floor to final installation on-site.
Modular by Design: Turning Architecture into a Manufacturing System
Modular construction is often presented as a faster way to build. Speed, however, is only one part of its value. The larger opportunity is to create a coordinated design and production system that improves quality, reduces uncertainty, and allows a building to move efficiently from concept design through manufacturing, transportation, installation, and completion.
Repeatability Begins with Trust: What Alora at Dry Creek Reveals About Scaling Modular Housing
Alora at Dry Creek, a 329-unit, multifamily community comprising five four-story buildings in Centennial, Colorado, demonstrates how repeatable design, standardized manufacturing and early collaboration can work together to create a model that is not only faster to deliver, but easier to replicate across future projects.
T.R. Arnold: The Art of Third-Party Inspections
T.R. Arnold (TRA), a third-party inspection company in Elkhart, Indiana, contracts with modular manufacturers across the US. Manufacturers register with each state to which they intend to send their modules and may be required to hire a third-party inspection company.
Creating an ‘Ecosystem for Innovation:’ 50+ Years of Modular Construction Oversight in Virginia
Virginia’s modular building program began in 1973, with the implementation of the Virginia Industrialized Building Unit and Mobile Home Safety Regulations. Now it’s leading the country in modular code adoption.
Understanding Thermal Barriers Compliance Methods & Emerging NFPA-275 Foam Plastic Technologies
New fire barrier technologies are improving total costs and margins in major areas of construction, such as commercial, government, union and prevailing wage projects. These benefits translate into other large fringe areas, such as agriculture, commercial cold storage facilities, grow houses, outbuildings, military and aviation hangars.