Skip to content

MBI Issues Policy Position on Tariffs & Their Impact on Modular Construction. Read the statement here.

Unlocking NYC’s Housing Potential: Scaling Modular Construction for Affordable Living

Simon Sai Man Li, LEED AP BD+C

Simon Sai Man Li, LEED AP BD+C, is a MS Construction Administration at Columbia University

New York City stands at a pivotal moment in its housing history. With over 60,000 individuals in city-funded shelters and soaring construction costs, the city faces a housing shortfall that threatens both its economic competitiveness and social equity. Traditional building methods are proving too slow and expensive to meet demand, but a viable alternative already exists.

Modular construction, which involves the off-site fabrication of volumetric units that are rapidly assembled on-site, presents a compelling path forward. Research conducted through my graduate thesis at Columbia University, supported by over a dozen expert interviews and comparative case studies, reveals that modular construction is not only feasible in NYC but also essential for delivering the scale and speed needed to address the city’s affordable housing crisis.

Current projections indicate that the New York City region will require 1.2 million new housing units by 2040. However, under existing zoning rules, only about 580,000 units can feasibly be built. This imbalance between supply and demand is driving up rents, accelerating displacement, and deepening inequality. Meanwhile, traditional construction methods are constrained by labor shortages, logistical complexity, and regulatory barriers.

Within the first quarter of 2025, house prices in the EU increased by 5.7%, and rents increased by 3.2% compared with the same quarter the previous year. Overall, house prices across the EU have risen on average by nearly 50% in the last 8-year period. The continued increase in demand and lack of supply is only going to compound the situation.

According to EUROSTAT, the EU averages for housing types in cities is around 70% of people live in apartments and 30% live in houses. The suburbs and towns have around 40% living in apartments and 60% living in houses. Without exception, the modular building industry can provide new build solutions for all of these requirements.

Modular construction has the potential to address these constraints. According to McKinsey & Company, modular construction can reduce project timelines by up to 50 percent and lower costs by as much as 20 percent. For affordable housing, where margins are tight and speed is critical, these advantages can be transformative. Factory-controlled environments also enhance quality and safety by reducing rework and minimizing weather-related delays.

Despite these benefits, modular construction remains underutilized in New York City. Understanding why this is the case is key to unlocking its potential.

Caption---Potential-Modular-Construction-Cost-Savings,-Source---McKinsey-&-Company,-2019_1200x1163

Potential Modular Construction Time Savings. Source: McKinsey Company

Although modular construction offers clear benefits, its wider adoption in NYC is hindered by four primary challenges:

1. Outdated Building Codes

The city’s current codes prohibit wood-framed modular systems in multifamily buildings and instead mandate steel construction for nearly all residential structures. This is in stark contrast to cities like Boston and Philadelphia, which allow fire-treated wood framing in buildings up to 85 feet tall.

2. Fragmented Oversight

Factory-built modules must often pass duplicative inspections from both local and out-of-state authorities. The lack of clarity over jurisdictional responsibilities combined with the absence of formal agreements recognizing prior inspections results in fragmented oversight. Without a framework for mutual recognition or streamlined local verification, these redundancies introduce delays and undermine the core time-saving potential of modular construction.

3. Incompatible Financing Models

Conventional lending practices disburse funds in stages as onsite work progresses. Modular projects, however, require substantial upfront capital to fund off-site fabrication, creating cashflow gaps that many developers struggle to manage.

4. Workforce and Supply Chain Gaps

There is currently insufficient modular manufacturing capacity within or near the city. Most regional factories are located out of state and specialize in wood-frame modules, which are not allowed under NYC’s existing building code.

Several NYC pilot projects have demonstrated modular construction’s potential while also revealing key implementation challenges:

Carmel Place (Manhattan)

This micro-unit modular development was completed swiftly and efficiently using just 55 modules assembled in under a month. However, it required mayoral zoning overrides and offered only limited affordable housing.

461 Dean Street (Brooklyn)

This 32-story project, once the tallest modular tower in the world, revealed the risks of high-rise modular development. Issues such as module misalignment and water infiltration caused major delays and cost overruns.

Linden Grove (Brooklyn)

This senior housing development highlights persistent logistical issues. Challenges such as restrictions limiting deliveries to a single designated weekday and inconsistent coordination have slowed progress despite careful planning.

Each case reinforces the value of modular construction but also underscores the need for modular-specific code reform, streamlined interagency oversight, and better-integrated project delivery structures tailored to modular workflows.

To move modular construction into the mainstream, New York City must implement targeted reforms across five key areas:

1. Modernize Building Codes

NYC must revise its building codes to permit fire-retardant-treated (FRT) wood-frame modular systems in mid-rise multifamily developments, up to 85 feet, mirroring cities like Boston and Philadelphia that already allow this under the IBC. Current restrictions under §602.3 and NYC’s Fire District provisions effectively ban combustible materials in exterior walls, even when fully sprinklered, forcing reliance on expensive steel-framed modules. Targeted amendments allowing UL-listed, 2-hour fire-rated FRT wood assemblies with NFPA 13 sprinklers would expand access to regional wood-based manufacturers currently excluded. In tandem, establishing a modular-specific code section and a standardized modular design reference framework would reduce compliance ambiguity, streamline plan reviews, and accelerate approvals. Together, these reforms would lower costs, increase supply capacity, and create a regulatory environment that encourages broader adoption of modular construction for affordable housing.

Caption---Potential-Modular-Construction-Time-Savings,-Source---McKinsey-&-Company,-2019_1200x1100

Potential Modular Construction: Time Savings. Source: McKinsey Company

2. Streamline Permitting and Inspections

A fast-track permitting pathway should be established specifically for modular affordable housing. A cross-agency review team including DOB, FDNY, DEP, DOT, DDC and HPD would help synchronize review cycles and eliminate sequential approval bottlenecks. Adopting mutual recognition of third-party factory certifications from out-of-state agencies could also eliminate redundant inspections, further reducing delays.

3. Realign Financial Tools

New financial instruments must accommodate modular construction’s upfront-heavy cost structure. Tax credits, grants, and low-interest loans tailored to modular projects would ease capital constraints. HPD is currently developing modular-specific term sheets to help developers align financing with production timelines; once formalized, these should be expanded in scope. A dedicated NYC modular housing fund could further attract investors and enable larger-scale developments.

4. Foster Public-Private Partnerships

City-owned land should be used strategically to continue piloting modular developments, with ground leases or reduced land costs enabling affordability. A “Modular Housing Accelerator” task force composed of public agencies and industry representatives could support these pilots from design through completion, ensuring aligned expectations and streamlined delivery. Knowledge-sharing forums should also be established to spread lessons learned across the sector.

5. Invest in Workforce and Local Manufacturing

Educational institutions, modular firms, and trade associations must collaborate to create modular-specific training and certification programs in areas such as DfMA workflows, fabrication-level 3D modelling, on-site module installation, and off-site module fabrication. At the same time, city incentives can encourage the establishment of local modular factories, enhance logistical infrastructure while anchoring job creation in local communities.

Scaling modular construction is not just about changing how we build. It requires a systemic shift in policy, financing, procurement, and workforce development. None of these reforms will succeed in isolation, but together they can transform modular housing from a niche solution into a core component of NYC’s affordable housing strategy.

When these changes are implemented in tandem, they have the potential to:

  • Shorten development timelines and improve cost predictability
  • Expand access to high-quality, affordable homes across all boroughs
  • Stretch public funding further and deliver more units for each tax dollar
  • Strengthen local economies by generating new jobs in construction and manufacturing
  • Establish NYC as a national leader in modular innovation and housing policy

By removing the policy and market barriers currently impeding modular growth, New York can enable developers, manufacturers, and city agencies to collaborate in new and improved ways. The result will be a faster, more predictable, and more affordable pathway to meeting the city’s housing needs.

More from Modular Advantage

Resia: Breaking All the Rules

Resia Manufacturing, a division of U.S.-based Resia, is now offering prefabricated bathroom and kitchen components to industry partners. Its hybrid fabrication facility produces more precise bathroom and kitchen components (modules) faster and at lower cost than traditional construction. Here’s how Resia Manufacturing does it.

How LINQ Modular Innovates to Bring Modular To The Market in the UAE and Beyond

LINQ Modular, with an office and three manufacturing facilities in Dubai, is a modular firm based in United Arab Emirates. The company is on a mission: to break open the housing and construction markets in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) area with modular.

ModMax: Redefining Modular Construction with Confidence and Precision

ModMax was born out of frustration—frustration with five persistent pain points in modular construction: Permitting bottlenecks. Production delays. Rigid designs. Disconnect between “the office” and the field. Lack of transparency and communication.

LifeArk: Disaster-Resilient Housing from Recycled Plastic and 100-year-old Technology

Wee compares LifeArk’s housing units to Yeti coolers, as they are built similarly. Each component takes 15 to 20 minutes to manufacture, has an R-value of 40, and includes molded slots and chases for wiring, plumbing, fire sprinklers, and other utilities.

Building the Future of Modular Edge Infrastructure

The edge data center market is expanding rapidly, driven by the surge in AI workloads, IoT adoption, and the need for localized compute power. In these environments, sustainability, scalability, and reliability are non-negotiable. Cooling is among the most complex challenges for operators—and one of the most decisive factors in long-term success.

Accelerating Light-Gauge Steel Construction: A Semi-Automated Digital Workflow for Off-Site Projects

For construction professionals, the message is clear. By adopting semi-automation and digitalization, companies can deliver projects faster, more accurately, and more profitably, while also building stronger collaboration across teams. The approach is not about replacing people with machines, but about empowering people with better tools and processes.

Why Modular Data Centers Are Gaining Momentum

Artificial intelligence, high-performance computing, and edge applications push the limits of traditional “stick-built” data centers. They take years build, often struggle with high density workloads, and aren’t optimized for deployments near end users. Modular data center platforms are purpose-built to address these challenges, offering flexibility and scalability to adapt to evolving technologies, while opening new opportunities for the modular construction industry.

Supply Chain Innovation in Action: 5 Habits Every Modular Leader Should Practice

By applying these principles to supply chain practices — collaborative planning, strategic procurement, scenario modeling, digital tools, and transparent forecasting — construction leaders can build value chains that are not just efficient and agile, but truly innovative.

Exploring the Role of Modular Integrated Construction (MiC) in Advancing Circular City Principles – A Survey of Stakeholder Perspectives

The survey findings highlight the significant potential of Modular integrated Construction (MiC) in advancing the development of circular cities. By reducing costs, accelerating construction timelines, and minimizing waste generation, MiC offers a promising approach to sustainable urban development.

The Use of MS POLYMER™-Based Sealants and Adhesives in Modular Building

These products combine flexibility and elastic recovery with excellent adhesion to different substrates and have already shown their usefulness in traditional construction. Now it’s time for them to be put to use in the modular construction industry.