What’s Next: UNB OCRC Student Competition Previews the Future of Offsite Building
For the second year in a row, the University of New Brunswick’s Off-Site Construction Research Centre (OCRC), a research group dedicated to optimizing alternate solutions to on-site construction, presented its Off-site Construction Student Design Competition in partnership with the OSCO Construction Group. This competition—sponsored again by the Modular Building Institute—showcased student design innovation in modular, prefabricated, panelized, and other types of off-site construction and featured entries from dozens of interdisciplinary collegiate teams.
The objective of the competition was simple: to introduce students to offsite construction and to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration. It was also an opportunity to showcase how offsite construction’s many benefits, including reduced construction timelines, improved safety, and improved construction quality, can benefit the construction industry.
The Challenge
This year’s teams were challenged to design and present plans for a residence building for the University of New Brunswick (Fredericton) campus. The building needed to be at least 50% prefabricated, and the proposal needed to demonstrate how an offsite solution can address the project needs. Students were encouraged to consider pre-cast elements, sustainable, green technologies in their solutions.
Project Requirements:
- Design a new residential/commercial structure to replace an existing structure on campus, including 3D renderings, technical drawings, assembly diagrams, and more
- New structure should include a daycare facility and commercial space on the first floor
- Upper levels of the new structure to be living spaces
- Targeted to be a LEED Gold and net zero building
- Other aspects to consider:
o Demolition methods
o Parking lot
o Construction methods and sequencing, considering the nearby school zone
o Local bylaws and zoning
o Inclusiveness and accessibility in the design
o Incorporation of Indigenous art
Judging Criteria
The entries were judged using three criteria:
- 25% graphic presentation/design
- 50% creative demonstration of the potential of offsite construction
- 25% project feasibility/buildability
“OCRC is always innovating new ways to move away from the traditional “stick-built” construction into prefabricated and off-site construction. We work with many student researchers for our projects and know the kind of value they bring. We had ideated the Off-site Construction Student Design Competition to present students with a fun learning-based opportunity to help put their innovations in front of a larger audience, get expert feedback, and showcase their abilities simultaneously. The second year of doing this competition brought in many great ideas that showcased prefabricated and off-site focused mixed commercial and residential buildings that are sustainable and meet the need of the hour. We would like to thank MBI for their continued support of the competition.”
Brandon Searle, Director, Innovation and Operations, OCRC, University of New Brunswick
The Winners
First Place: The Montgomery Complex
Team members: Anneliese Sirju, Luisa Prestes, Luz Almazan Martinez, Leslie Anne Bugayong, Julianne Brewer, Jiyoung Park, Hyoung Sik Yoon, and Ming Kai Tang (Southern Alberta Institute of Technology)
“More than student residence, The Montgomery Complex includes spaces that enhance the life of the students and their families. It strives to connect with native roots using Mi’kmaq patterns in its façade but also provides walls for local talent’s art. With a combination of steel and mass-timber, this building aims to create a positive impact in the area, offering a new type of conscious architecture.”
“We started developing the geometry of the design by using the existing buildings footprint as reference,” says team leader Luz Almazon. “Our first ideas leaned towards an L-shaped building which later evolved into two towers connected by terraces. This final itineration allowed us to stay within a scale that was not too overwhelming in terms of design.”
Teammate Leslie Bugayong added, “The majority of the walls would be built offsite. The interior CLT panels could be manufactured nearby while exterior walls would be insulated panels.”
“Construction would be efficient, more sustainable than using traditional methods, and could set the standard for a new type of architecture in the area,” concluded Almazon.
Second Place: The Magee-Mcloud Housing
Team members: Simon-Olivier Fortin, Sarah Samsoudin, and Charles-Emmanuel Lambert (Université du Québec à Montréal)
“We started working on the plans with a grid pretty early on in order to coordinate the structure and the layouts efficiently,” said team member Sarah Samsoudin. “We went through a lot of iterations while trying to figure out the best option. The goal was to offer large common spaces and smaller private rooms without compromising privacy and comfort, as well as avoiding waste and promoting a modular approach.
The rooftops, in a similar layout to the ground floors, each have two terraces and two co-working areas aligned with the vertical circulation blocs. At the heart of the floor is a mixed-use space, related to the commercial usage on the ground floor. On top of the market is a greenhouse, on top of the drugstore is a gym and of top of the daycare is a reception hall. These amenities would be available to all students, not only those living in the residences, to create a stronger sense of community.”
“I love that offsite construction and modular design, through architecture, is a way to express the celebration of modernity and technological advancements. A very large portion of the world’s carbon emissions comes from construction, and it is our duty, as designers of tomorrow, to act
ethically towards our planet and its occupants.”
—Sarah Samsoudin, part of this year’s second place-winning team from Université du Québec à Montréal
About the Author: John McMullen, PCM, is the marketing director for the Modular Building Institute. You can reach him directly at mcmullen@modular.org or on LinkedIn.
More from Modular Advantage
A Huge Win for the Modular Construction Industry in Massachusetts
In early February, 2024, the Massachusetts Board of Building Regulations and Standards (BBRS) released its proposed 10th Edition building codes. This draft included several amendments targeting modular construction that would have created an extremely difficult environment for the entire modular industry and could have eliminated the industry entirely in the state.
FEMA Announces Hawaii Housing Plan Using Modular Construction
Utah becomes the second state in the country, following Virginia, to fully adopt ICC/MBI standards 1200 and 1205. MBI will continue to work with leadership in Utah to implement the new program.
Supply and Demand: Solving Canada’s Housing Crisis One Relocatable Housing Unit at a Time
Not only do Moda Modular’s repurposed employee housing solutions cut the emissions related to construction down to nearly zero, but they also keep building materials that are often not biodegradable from slowly decaying in storage facilities.
It’s the classic environmental mantra of reduce, reuse, and recycle, scaled up and applied to building after building.
ICC/MBI Standards 1200 & 1205 Provide Foundation for Utah’s First-Ever State Modular Program
Utah becomes the second state in the country, following Virginia, to fully adopt ICC/MBI standards 1200 and 1205. MBI will continue to work with leadership in Utah to implement the new program.
Repetition, Communication, and Coordination: A QSR Case Study
This modular QSR project seemed like any another modular building on the surface. Inside, it was anything but. The rhythm, the desire to iterate and repeat, and the constant communication between all parties made it stand out.
Modular Architecture: Thinking Outside of the Box with Sara.Ann Logan
At a time when modular buildings were still seen as less than by many in the architecture and construction world, Sara.Ann Logan took the plunge and partnered to launch a design-build firm that designed, built, and constructed modular high-end single-family homes. But even though she could see the value of this kind of construction, it wasn’t universally accepted.
Colorado Developer ‘Attacks’ Attainable Housing Crisis
City, county, and state government bodies are reaching out to Fading West Development, a modular manufacturer and developer in Buena Vista, CO, to learn more about how they are using modular construction to solve the affordable housing crisis in Colorado. Governments are eager to learn how they’ve made modular development successful and profitable while meeting the growing need for affordable housing.
CES Group’s Stuart Cameron Will Convince You the Moon Is Achievable with Modularized MEP
While most people think of construction as a gradually layered process, MEP assemblies—such as the modular ones—tend to provide all-in-one installs, like a car factory. A modular MEP product helps developers, architects, and fellow modular manufacturers reach their goals through early integration and planning. MEP assemblies address all the unseen things like electrical, heating, and plumbing when looking at a finalized building. The very nature of MEP assemblies are crucial to any initial prospectus.
Automation: The Future for Offsite Modular Construction
Offsite modular construction lags far behind other industries in embracing and adopting automation. Some people believe it will decrease jobs. Others feel they’ve done okay without it, so why change? In reality, conventional construction methods simply cannot keep up. Cooper Lane of Brave Control Solutions points to the labor shortage and the housing crisis that’s rampant in Canada, the U.S., and globally.
Seizing the Modular Construction Opportunity
The CSA Public Policy Centre’s new report, Seizing the Modular Construction Opportunity, highlights how innovative modular methods can help to bring various building forms—from single unit housing to complex high-rises—online more quickly. Owing to efficient manufacturing practices and controlled factory environments, modular can achieve completion rates that are 25% to 50% faster than conventional construction approaches.