Five Policies States Can Implement to Address Housing Needs
I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that our current polices to address affordable housing are falling short. The U.S. has a shortage of seven million rental homes affordable and available to extremely low-income renters, whose household incomes are at or below the poverty guideline. Only thirty-six affordable and available rental homes exist for every one hundred extremely low-income renter households. (Source: National Low Income Housing Coalition).
That’s not to say housing authorities and agencies are not trying. But in many cases, some regulations are in direct conflict with the goals of creating more affordable housing. Consider this scenario:
The Biden Administration recently announced its affordable housing plan to help close the housing supply gap over the next five years. The plan rewards jurisdictions that reform prohibitive zoning requirements, deploys new financing mechanisms, and pilots new financing programs for housing production, including accessory dwelling units and modular housing. This is all very welcome news for housing authorities across the country.
However, at the same time, the U.S. Department of Labor is re-defining and expanding the purpose and scope of the decades-old Davis Bacon Act to require prevailing wages to now be paid in offsite modular factories. The impact of this move will increase the costs for modular multifamily projects under HUD by 7-10%. But more likely will result in modular companies simply opting out of any federally funded projects. When you consider that the multifamily sector is the fastest growing and largest segment for the modular industry, this move by the Administration will result in FEWER housing units over the next five years.
Only 36 affordable and available rental homes exist for every 100 extremely low-income renter households. The modulr and offsite industries are primed to help, but their help isn't being embraced by policy makers.
Here's What's Already Working
What can states do now to help facilitate the growth of housing supply? Here are five recommendations that are working in some areas of the country:
1. When analyzing projects that have applied for low-income tax credits, add “innovation” criteria / points to the score card. Virginia does this and allows the developer to define exactly HOW their project will be innovative and further recommends that saving time or saving money would qualify for the extra credit. Adding a time completion element to the credits will make more housing inventory available sooner.
2. Embrace an “all of the above” approach to housing. Again, the State of Virginia updated and expanded their industrialized building program regulations to include all forms of industrialized construction processes including panelized, modified containers, and accessory dwelling units, in addition to modular and manufactured housing.
3. Adopt the ICC/MBI 1200 and 1205 Standards. These standards set the criteria for how modular and offsite buildings are reviewed and inspected to ensure safety and code compliance. By adopting industry standards, states are embracing a process that is well known and easy to understand for modular manufacturers. (And ICC/MBI 1210 is coming soon!)
4. Incentivize existing manufacturers. Many states have economic development agencies that provide incentives to recruit new manufacturers to their state. But what about the existing manufacturers? States could provide tax incentives for job growth, investments in machinery and equipment to improve productivity, or number of housing units built. Don’t just chase new manufacturers.
5. Start the process of teaching industrialized construction in addition to traditional trades, in vocational schools and community colleges. Work with existing manufacturers on factory tours, guest speaking opportunities, and internships. Having a workforce with training in this background is HIGHLY appealing to modular and offsite manufacturers. The National Center for Construction Education and Research (NCCER) has already developed training programs for industrialized / manufactured construction and a high percentage of vocational instructors already use NCCER curriculum.
It's Time to Work Together
You may have noticed that the above policy suggestions impact building codes, housing, economic development, and education. My last point is that states require top leadership in each of these areas to meet regularly to discuss potential policy changes. Ideally this will ensure some synchronization among agencies and help each achieve their goals. But at the very least, the right hand should know what the left hand is doing.
More from Modular Advantage
This modular QSR project seemed like any another modular building on the surface. Inside, it was anything but. The rhythm, the desire to iterate and repeat, and the constant communication between all parties made it stand out.
At a time when modular buildings were still seen as less than by many in the architecture and construction world, Sara.Ann Logan took the plunge and partnered to launch a design-build firm that designed, built, and constructed modular high-end single-family homes. But even though she could see the value of this kind of construction, it wasn’t universally accepted.
City, county, and state government bodies are reaching out to Fading West Development, a modular manufacturer and developer in Buena Vista, CO, to learn more about how they are using modular construction to solve the affordable housing crisis in Colorado. Governments are eager to learn how they’ve made modular development successful and profitable while meeting the growing need for affordable housing.
While most people think of construction as a gradually layered process, MEP assemblies—such as the modular ones—tend to provide all-in-one installs, like a car factory. A modular MEP product helps developers, architects, and fellow modular manufacturers reach their goals through early integration and planning. MEP assemblies address all the unseen things like electrical, heating, and plumbing when looking at a finalized building. The very nature of MEP assemblies are crucial to any initial prospectus.
Offsite modular construction lags far behind other industries in embracing and adopting automation. Some people believe it will decrease jobs. Others feel they’ve done okay without it, so why change? In reality, conventional construction methods simply cannot keep up. Cooper Lane of Brave Control Solutions points to the labor shortage and the housing crisis that’s rampant in Canada, the U.S., and globally.
The CSA Public Policy Centre’s new report, Seizing the Modular Construction Opportunity, highlights how innovative modular methods can help to bring various building forms—from single unit housing to complex high-rises—online more quickly. Owing to efficient manufacturing practices and controlled factory environments, modular can achieve completion rates that are 25% to 50% faster than conventional construction approaches.
A new set of considerations have induced leaders of major global manufacturing enterprises to reconsider their site selection decisions. Among these are: 1) a desire for simpler logistics emphasizing shorter transit distances and times; 2) a need to better protect intellectual property; 3) more reliable court systems; 4) incentives offered by the USMCA, America’s trade deal with Canada and Mexico; and 5) a recent set of subsidies offered under packages like the Chips and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act.
Air casters mean flexibility, not just in terms of movement but also in terms of change. For example, one structure might be 56-feet-long and another 76-feet-long. Air casters allow manufacturers to easily accommodate a variety of shapes and sizes of boxes and then make changes on the fly.
In his “Moonshot” speech in 1962, President Kennedy challenged his fellow citizens to land a man on the moon and bring him safely back to earth before 1970. He showed leadership, reimagining human potential and progress, and this famous speech has been an inspiration for many to get things done. Likewise, a “Home-shot” speech that challenges citizens to remove lengthy procedures and “carefully” remove some of the mountain of red tape required for permitting before 2030 would certainly make a huge difference.
Born in Jordan forty years ago, Nesheiwat is something of an outsider to the modular housing world. His entrepreneurial spirit led him from a childhood growing up in Yonkers, New York, to the more provincial location of Poughkeepsie where he delved into many unique business ventures. Not one to shy away from a challenge, he took on projects that seemed impossible, often in the housing sector. His innate sense of the fundamentals in finance, corporate branding, and business expansion have led him to where he is today.