Relocatable Buildings vs. Permanent Modular Construction: What's the Difference?
Modular construction is revolutionizing the construction industry as a super-efficient and sustainable solution for building faster, stronger, and more predictably.
There are two types of modular structures- Relocatable Buildings and Permanent Modular Construction. While both construction types offer a plethora of benefits, there are distinct differences.
In this article, we'll help you understand the differences between permanent modular construction and relocatable buildings.
This hospital in New York is an MBI Awards of Distinction-winning example of permanent modular construction.
These luxury cabins are an MBI Awards of Distinction-winning example of relocatable buildings.
What is Modular Construction?
Also known as volumetric construction, modular construction uses individual sections or modules, which are assembled off-site in factories under controlled conditions, to create complete structures of all shapes and sizes.
The modules themselves use the same designs and materials as traditional construction and meet all the same building standards and codes. The modules are then transported and put together at the final construction site.
There are two main methods of modular construction:
Permanent Modular Construction (PMC)
PMC is a sustainable and innovative building technique that utilizes offsite and lean manufacturing methods to prefabricate either single or multi-story structures in modular sections. PMC can be integrated into an existing structure or can be built to stand independently. The modules can then be completed with MEP interior finishes, fixtures, and appliances. The Hawaii Film Studio, for example, used PMC to meet strict timeline and budget requirements. Other examples of permanent modular construction include healthcare facilities, hotels, schools, and restaurants.
Relocatable Buildings
Also known as portable buildings, RBs are partially or completely constructed structures that also abide by set building codes and are assembled in a controlled manufacturing facility through the modular construction process.
Relocatable buildings are made to be repurposed and transported to various building sites. They can be used for medical clinics, schools, sales centers, and construction sites, among others.
The Differences Between Relocatable and Permanent Modular
1. Duration Of Use
Permanent modular structures are fabricated and installed for long-term use. They are designed to be durable, just like conventional buildings, and can last just as long (or longer) than traditionally-constructed buildings.
Relocatable buildings, on the other hand, are installed for a shorter intended duration; a few months or a year, for instance. They are also designed durable enough to withstand several relocations and installations.
2. Types of Materials Used
Because permanent modular structures are intended for longer use, they are typically constructed with wood, steel, and/or concrete. Relocatable buildings, on the other hand, are usually made of wood to make them lightweight and easier to transport and reinstall.
3. Building Purpose
Permanent modular buildings are designed to remain in one location for an extended period of time.
Temporary modular buildings are ideal for situations that demand quick construction and future relocation and repurposing. They are mostly built to offer temporary housing such as, construction sites, or mobile showrooms, as well as for some commercial purposes.
4. Architecture
When it comes to architecture options, temporary modular structures offer less design and layout choices. They also offer fewer options for customization.
Though the architect's plans for PMC must be settled well before construction begins, permanent modular buildings offer nearly endless options. From the addition of lobbies to elevators and stairwells, these structures offer construction engineers and consumers alike countless design possibilities.
5. Construction Duration
While the duration of construction will depend on the scope of work, relocatable buildings have the potential to be on-site and ready to use within weeks.
On the other hand, permanent modular buildings may take months or more to construct and assemble on-site based on the structure's size and design. Despite the differences between the two types of modular construction, both types offer owners many benefits. The benefits include: less material waste, faster completion of projects because of indoor construction, safer construction, and a quicker return on investment. For a complete list of the Modular Building Institute's(MBI) PMC and RB manufacturers, click here.
More from Modular Advantage
From Model to Machine: Why Modular Scale Is Becoming a Software Problem, not a Material One
For modular manufacturers that have already secured demand and repeatable volume, the next major constraint may no longer be forming capacity itself. Increasingly, it is the continuity of the information feeding that capacity.
Who Will Define Modular Products for AI?
Artificial intelligence is making building configurators easier and less expensive to create. This makes urgent manufacturers’ need portable product definitions, stable identities, and shared interfaces regardless of how others’ software is produced.
From BIM to Robotic Production: A Digital Workflow for Customized Components in Volumetric Modular Construction
For volumetric modular manufacturers, the value of this workflow is not simply the use of robotics. Its real value is continuity.
Helping Build a Common Framework for Modular Construction in Canada
Canada’s modular construction sector continues to gain momentum, but scaling it successfully will depend on shared expectations across design, manufacturing, approvals, and project delivery. CSA Z251 helps provide that common foundation.
Edges, Exits & Equipment: A Modular Builder’s Guide to Rooftop Access
Rooftop access belongs in the factory design. Before the modules ship, the project team should identify each route’s users, confirm applicable requirements, coordinate with the roof system and structure, and assign responsibility.
When Timber Production and Modular Construction Share One System
As demand for multifamily and workforce housing continues to outpace what conventional construction timelines can deliver, models that reduce the number of handoffs between structural fabrication and modular assembly are likely to draw more attention.
Your AI Strategy Is an Enablement Strategy
Tools will change. Teaching employees only the steps in one platform creates a narrow capability. Involving them in problem definition, process mapping, data assessment, controls, and measurement gives the organization a way to improve its systems as technology evolves.
By-Right Permitting: The Missing Lever for Scaling Modular Multifamily
Modular has already proven it can outperform traditional building methods on speed and cost per unit. The next frontier is outside the factory in the front end of the process, where projects either clear a path to construction or get stuck in review.
Remote Inspections and The Future of Factory Oversight
Remote inspection is becoming a practical part of modular construction oversight. Its value is greatest when it is used selectively, governed by clear procedures, and supported by complete traceability.
Reimagining Dry-In: How a Temporary-to-Permanent Roofing Strategy Mitigates Risk Between Modular Installation and Final Roof Construction
As volumetric modular projects continue to increase in scale and complexity, the Temporary-to-Permanent FiberTite Roof System represents an example of how traditional trade scopes can be reimagined through Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) principles.