Skip to content

Relocatable Buildings vs. Permanent Modular Construction: What's the Difference?

Modular construction is revolutionizing the construction industry as a super-efficient and sustainable solution for building faster, stronger, and more predictably.

There are two types of modular structures- Relocatable Buildings and Permanent Modular Construction. While both construction types offer a plethora of benefits, there are distinct differences.

In this article, we'll help you understand the differences between permanent modular construction and relocatable buildings.

gotham1

This hospital in New York is an  MBI Awards of Distinction-winning example of permanent modular construction.

tinycabins

These luxury cabins are an MBI Awards of Distinction-winning example of relocatable buildings.

What is Modular Construction?

Also known as volumetric construction, modular construction uses individual sections or modules, which are assembled off-site in factories under controlled conditions, to create complete structures of all shapes and sizes.

The modules themselves use the same designs and materials as traditional construction and meet all the same building standards and codes. The modules are then transported and put together at the final construction site.

There are two main methods of modular construction:

Permanent Modular Construction (PMC)

PMC is a sustainable and innovative building technique that utilizes offsite and lean manufacturing methods to prefabricate either single or multi-story structures in modular sections. PMC can be integrated into an existing structure or can be built to stand independently. The modules can then be completed with MEP interior finishes, fixtures, and appliances. The Hawaii Film Studio, for example, used PMC to meet strict timeline and budget requirements. Other examples of permanent modular construction include healthcare facilities, hotels, schools, and restaurants.

Relocatable Buildings

Also known as portable buildings, RBs are partially or completely constructed structures that also abide by set building codes and are assembled in a controlled manufacturing facility through the modular construction process.

Relocatable buildings are made to be repurposed and transported to various building sites. They can be used for medical clinics, schools, sales centers, and construction site offices, among others.

The Differences Between Relocatable and Permanent Modular

1. Duration Of Use

Permanent modular structures are fabricated and installed for long-term use. They are designed to be durable, just like conventional buildings, and can last just as long (or longer) than traditionally-constructed buildings.

Relocatable buildings, on the other hand, are installed for a shorter intended duration; a few months or a year, for instance. They are also designed durable enough to withstand several relocations and installations.

2. Types of Materials Used

Because permanent modular structures are intended for longer use, they are typically constructed with wood, steel, and/or concrete. Relocatable buildings, on the other hand, are usually made of wood to make them lightweight and easier to transport and reinstall.

3. Building Purpose

Permanent modular buildings are designed to remain in one location for an extended period of time.

Temporary modular buildings are ideal for situations that demand quick construction and future relocation and repurposing. They are mostly built to offer temporary housing such as, construction site offices, or mobile showrooms, as well as for some commercial purposes.

4. Architecture

When it comes to architecture options, temporary modular structures offer less design and layout choices. They also offer fewer options for customization.

Though the architect's plans for PMC must be settled well before construction begins, permanent modular buildings offer nearly endless options. From the addition of lobbies to elevators and stairwells, these structures offer construction engineers and consumers alike countless design possibilities.

5. Construction Duration

While the duration of construction will depend on the scope of work, relocatable buildings have the potential to be on-site and ready to use within weeks.

On the other hand, permanent modular buildings may take months or more to construct and assemble on-site based on the structure's size and design. Despite the differences between the two types of modular construction, both types offer owners many benefits. The benefits include: less material waste, faster completion of projects because of indoor construction, safer construction, and a quicker return on investment. For a complete list of the Modular Building Institute's PMC and RB manufacturers, click here.

More from Modular Advantage

A Huge Win for the Modular Construction Industry in Massachusetts

In early February, 2024, the Massachusetts Board of Building Regulations and Standards (BBRS) released its proposed 10th Edition building codes. This draft included several amendments targeting modular construction that would have created an extremely difficult environment for the entire modular industry and could have eliminated the industry entirely in the state.

FEMA Announces Hawaii Housing Plan Using Modular Construction

Utah becomes the second state in the country, following Virginia, to fully adopt ICC/MBI standards 1200 and 1205. MBI will continue to work with leadership in Utah to implement the new program.

Supply and Demand: Solving Canada’s Housing Crisis One Relocatable Housing Unit at a Time

Not only do Moda Modular’s repurposed employee housing solutions cut the emissions related to construction down to nearly zero, but they also keep building materials that are often not biodegradable from slowly decaying in storage facilities.
It’s the classic environmental mantra of reduce, reuse, and recycle, scaled up and applied to building after building.

ICC/MBI Standards 1200 & 1205 Provide Foundation for Utah’s First-Ever State Modular Program

Utah becomes the second state in the country, following Virginia, to fully adopt ICC/MBI standards 1200 and 1205. MBI will continue to work with leadership in Utah to implement the new program.

Repetition, Communication, and Coordination: A QSR Case Study

This modular QSR project seemed like any another modular building on the surface. Inside, it was anything but. The rhythm, the desire to iterate and repeat, and the constant communication between all parties made it stand out.

Modular Architecture: Thinking Outside of the Box with Sara.Ann Logan

At a time when modular buildings were still seen as less than by many in the architecture and construction world, Sara.Ann Logan took the plunge and partnered to launch a design-build firm that designed, built, and constructed modular high-end single-family homes. But even though she could see the value of this kind of construction, it wasn’t universally accepted.

Colorado Developer ‘Attacks’ Attainable Housing Crisis

City, county, and state government bodies are reaching out to Fading West Development, a modular manufacturer and developer in Buena Vista, CO, to learn more about how they are using modular construction to solve the affordable housing crisis in Colorado. Governments are eager to learn how they’ve made modular development successful and profitable while meeting the growing need for affordable housing.

CES Group’s Stuart Cameron Will Convince You the Moon Is Achievable with Modularized MEP

While most people think of construction as a gradually layered process, MEP assemblies—such as the modular ones—tend to provide all-in-one installs, like a car factory. A modular MEP product helps developers, architects, and fellow modular manufacturers reach their goals through early integration and planning. MEP assemblies address all the unseen things like electrical, heating, and plumbing when looking at a finalized building. The very nature of MEP assemblies are crucial to any initial prospectus.

Automation: The Future for Offsite Modular Construction

Offsite modular construction lags far behind other industries in embracing and adopting automation. Some people believe it will decrease jobs. Others feel they’ve done okay without it, so why change? In reality, conventional construction methods simply cannot keep up. Cooper Lane of Brave Control Solutions points to the labor shortage and the housing crisis that’s rampant in Canada, the U.S., and globally.

Seizing the Modular Construction Opportunity

The CSA Public Policy Centre’s new report, Seizing the Modular Construction Opportunity, highlights how innovative modular methods can help to bring various building forms—from single unit housing to complex high-rises—online more quickly. Owing to efficient manufacturing practices and controlled factory environments, modular can achieve completion rates that are 25% to 50% faster than conventional construction approaches.