Skip to content

The Modular Solution to the Construction Labor Shortage

It is not too difficult to find articles citing the construction industry’s woes over the shortage of available skilled workers. All sorts of initiatives, efforts, and conferences have been held on the topic for the last decade or so in an effort to reach more young people and gain more entrants into the industry.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) there are currently 143,000 vacant construction positions nationwide. And these job openings are not minimum wage positions either. BLS data shows that the mean wages for a person in the non-residential building industry is just over $25 per hour. Of course, this is a general average among all trades and regions, but certainly respectable pay

A recent survey by the NAHB revealed that 69% of its members were experiencing delays in completing projects on time due to a shortage of qualified workers, while other jobs were lost altogether. And the problem isn’t going away anytime soon.

According to the 2015 Workforce Survey Results from Associated General Contractors (AGC) of America, over 60% believe it will continue to be hard to hire or become harder to hire construction professionals. In 2010, the average age of a construction worker was 40.2 years. By 2016, that number rose to 42.7 years, demonstrating that the workforce continues to age.

So, if we have nearly 150,000 openings at an average of $25/hour, why can’t we fill these jobs? In our opinion, it comes down to three things:

• Lack of workforce training
• Culture of inefficiency
• Working harder, not smarter

Lack of workforce training

Just because there are 143,000 openings now, doesn’t mean there are 143,000 qualified people to do the work where it needs to be done. Over the past decade, U.S. educational policies and resources have shifted more towards college readiness, at the expense (we think) of vocational training programs. Local, state, and federal policy makers need to recognize and support the value and importance of community colleges, apprenticeship programs, and vocational training on our economy. (See sidebar story on TRACOM).

The outlook for the construction industry, in terms of job opportunities, is strong. On their website, BLS states: employment of construction and extraction occupations is projected to grow 11% from 2016 to 2026, faster than the average for all occupations, a gain of about 758,400 new jobs. Overall growth in the economy and population will increase demand for new buildings, roads, and other structures, which will create new jobs in construction and extraction occupations. The median annual wage for all construction and extraction occupations was $43,610 in May 2016, which was higher than the median annual wage for all occupations, which was $37,040. If we can’t find workers now, where will we find the three quarters of a million more workers needed to fill these positions?

Culture of Inefficiency

In the construction industry, nearly 42% of all workers are employed by “very small employers” (defined by the U.S. Census Bureau as fewer than 20 people). That is nearly 2.5 times the national average of 17.6% of all workers in all industries employed by very small firms.

Many of these very small employers have little to no experience with the challenges of owning and operating a business. Specifically, smaller contractors struggle with recruiting, screening, and training new employees, navigating the human resource requirements, offering and managing fringe benefits, and regularly evaluating and promoting workers. “Training” consists almost exclusively of on-the-job experience.

So, it may not be a huge surprise to learn that safety has been, and continues to be, an issue in the construction industry. The BLS reports that there were 985 industry fatalities in 2015, up 5% from 2014. There was also a 15% increase in the number of reportable injuries and illnesses, according to that same 2015 AGC workforce survey.

These issues lead to higher costs, higher turnover, lower productivity, and lower employee morale. Within the private sector, workers in manufacturing had the highest tenure among major industries, at 5.3 years in January 2016, compared to 4.0 years for the construction industry (BLS).

Working harder, not smarter

The reality is actually the opposite of the old saying we’ve all heard 1,000 times. When it comes to construction, the answer always seems to be “we need more people.” The construction industry is one of the few remaining industries so heavily reliant on physical labor, embracing the “next man up” mentality. No time for training, gotta get the job done on time.

According to McKinsey Global Institute: “Consider that in the United States between 1947 and 2010, agriculture achieved cumulative real growth in its productivity of 1,510% and manufacturing 760%. Construction managed only 6%. U.S. construction-sector productivity is lower today than it was in 1968, and investment has fallen over the past decade. Over the past 20 years, productivity has grown at only 1% annually, only around one-third the rate of the world economy and only around one-quarter of the rate in manufacturing."

What’s the Message?

Is it any wonder that younger people are NOT entering the construction industry? Our policy makers place little to no value on vocational training. Small employers are more focused on selling the next job than training and retaining employees. Fringe benefits? Steady paycheck? Maybe, maybe not. Hard work, harsh outdoor environments, risky working conditions? Highly likely. Cool stuff like technology, automation, building information modeling? Not at most of the construction companies – no time, budget, or appetite for those things.

Related Reading:
The U.S. Construction Industry: A National Crisis Looming

With the U.S. economy strong again and unemployment rates historically low, one might wonder why anyone would think a crisis is looming. The answer is simple: there are not enough skilled workers to build all the projects that need to be built in the same manner they have been built in the past. The demand (need) for construction in the U.S. is high while the supply of labor is flat and declining relative to demand.

Read the white paper here.

The Modular Solution to the Construction Labor Problem – Industrialization

Currently, the modular industry in the United States accounts for about 3% of all new building and home construction starts, a much lower adoption rate than in other developed nations. In Japan, for example, nearly 20% of all homes are constructed with an industrialized or prefabricated process. Sweden has the highest adoption rate with a whopping 84% of detached homes prefabricated.

There is a major difference between the US (and Canadian) industry compared to other European and Asian countries. In North America, we still CONSTRUCT buildings piece-by-piece, nail-by-nail, site-by-site, with all the variables, conditions, and challenges associated project-by-project. Other countries approach their construction industry with a manufacturing and assembly focus. They think in terms of processes instead of projects with a goal of minimizing waste and inefficienc

The Japanese are experts in lean manufacturing techniques. They used this expertise to “school” the U.S. auto industry in the 1970s-80s. They also transferred their knowledge and best practices from their auto industry to their construction industry. Today, about seven major modular home factories in Japan crank out over 100,000 homes annually. That’s more than the entire U.S. modular home industry. Ironically, the U.S. auto industry DID eventually learn this lesson and now assembles cars made up from components manufactured at other plants. It no longer takes a mechanic to build a car.

Another major difference in adoption rates is that other governments are banking on and supporting industrialization and manufacturing efforts. The U.K. government recently announced a deal with a Chinese company to open six manufacturing plants in the U.K., employing U.K. citizens and building 25,000 housing units for the people of the U.K.

Now, at this point you may be thinking that industrialization of the construction industry would mean FEWER workers needed. Possibly. More accurately it would mean workers with a slightly different skill set are needed.

Japanese modular home manufacturer Sekisui Heim, the house-building segment of the Sekisui Chemical Company, is one of the largest modular home manufacturers in the world. The company employs nearly 4,000 people at their eight manufacturing plants, which produce over 1,000 homes each month. Simple math shows that on average, 4 workers build one home each month.

Many countries are embracing industrialization in part due to difficulty in finding labor, but also due to the high demand for more affordable housing inventory. In the U.S., we currently have:

1. A shortage of skilled construction labor.
2. A shortage of decent, affordable housing inventory.
3. A vastly under-utilized manufacturing base/ infrastructure.
4. A need for more stable, predictable jobs.

The modular industry can offer more predictable work locations and hours, less labor-intensive work, a higher degree of technology integration in the work place, and much safer working conditions.

We can serve as a catalyst for the major rebirth of the US manufacturing base, creating thousands of new jobs while addressing our own massive infrastructure needs. It just makes sense, doesn’t it?

Now, here’s the kicker – if U.S. construction industry and policy makers DO NOT endorse/encourage/ support the industrialization of the construction industry, it will happen anyway with someone else in the driver’s seat. Foreign investment will continue to flow into U.S. construction markets. We can encourage investment in our manufacturing capabilities, or we can keep trying to sell buggy whips, rotary phones, polaroid film, and beta max movies.

Training Program Provides Skills and Credentials for Industry

TRAMCON (TRAining for Manufactured CONstruction) is a $10M grant-funded program through the U.S. Department of Labor. TRAMCON is a consortium of 4 Florida colleges (Miami Dade College, Santa Fe College, Polk State College, and Seminole State College) selected to provide a tuition-free training program in manufactured construction.

The program combines curriculum developed by the University of Florida, National Center for Construction Education and Research (NCCER), and the Manufacturing Skill Standards Council (MSSC) to create a standardized model for manufactured construction. TRAMCON is designed for participants to gain stackable qualifications which consist of up to seven credentials and certifications (OSHA, MSSC, 3 NCCER Credentials, Fork Lift, and Aerial Platform certifications).

The purpose for the development of the TRAMCON program is to provide training for the manufactured construction industry in order to increase productivity and reduce turnover of employees through training and education. To date, the consortium has 1,744 participants, 1,356 completers, and 1,687 certificates earned.

Santa Fe College has had amazing success stories with these participants. One participant who had been unemployed for quite some time completed the foundation level of training and was placed in a job in a local woodworking shop. He continued the TRAMCON program and completed Basic and Advanced Levels while working fulltime. Another participant came in as an unemployed veteran. He had previous construction experience, but had no credentials or certification to show for it. He completed the foundation level of training and gained employment with a local company that manufactures and builds theme park attractions and decorations. He has since been promoted from his original position and loves his job!

The program is currently in the wind-down stages of training and will end on March 31, 2018. The participating schools are now looking for ways to assist employers and industry leaders in educating and training employees in manufactured construction. Over the past two and half years using the TRAMCON model, the program administrators have a good idea of best practices, what works, and how to best deliver manufactured construction training. The goal is to see TRAMCON continue as either a short training program, a pre-apprenticeship model, or a full apprenticeship model.

If you are interested in learning more about this program, contact MBI for program details.

This article originally appeared in the Modular Advantage Magazine - First Quarter 2018 released in February 2018.

More from Modular Advantage

Repetition, Communication, and Coordination: A QSR Case Study

This modular QSR project seemed like any another modular building on the surface. Inside, it was anything but. The rhythm, the desire to iterate and repeat, and the constant communication between all parties made it stand out.

Modular Architecture: Thinking Outside of the Box with Sara.Ann Logan

At a time when modular buildings were still seen as less than by many in the architecture and construction world, Sara.Ann Logan took the plunge and partnered to launch a design-build firm that designed, built, and constructed modular high-end single-family homes. But even though she could see the value of this kind of construction, it wasn’t universally accepted.

Colorado Developer ‘Attacks’ Attainable Housing Crisis

City, county, and state government bodies are reaching out to Fading West Development, a modular manufacturer and developer in Buena Vista, CO, to learn more about how they are using modular construction to solve the affordable housing crisis in Colorado. Governments are eager to learn how they’ve made modular development successful and profitable while meeting the growing need for affordable housing.

CES Group’s Stuart Cameron Will Convince You the Moon Is Achievable with Modularized MEP

While most people think of construction as a gradually layered process, MEP assemblies—such as the modular ones—tend to provide all-in-one installs, like a car factory. A modular MEP product helps developers, architects, and fellow modular manufacturers reach their goals through early integration and planning. MEP assemblies address all the unseen things like electrical, heating, and plumbing when looking at a finalized building. The very nature of MEP assemblies are crucial to any initial prospectus.

Automation: The Future for Offsite Modular Construction

Offsite modular construction lags far behind other industries in embracing and adopting automation. Some people believe it will decrease jobs. Others feel they’ve done okay without it, so why change? In reality, conventional construction methods simply cannot keep up. Cooper Lane of Brave Control Solutions points to the labor shortage and the housing crisis that’s rampant in Canada, the U.S., and globally.

Seizing the Modular Construction Opportunity

The CSA Public Policy Centre’s new report, Seizing the Modular Construction Opportunity, highlights how innovative modular methods can help to bring various building forms—from single unit housing to complex high-rises—online more quickly. Owing to efficient manufacturing practices and controlled factory environments, modular can achieve completion rates that are 25% to 50% faster than conventional construction approaches.

Structural versus Cyclical: What Matters More?

A new set of considerations have induced leaders of major global manufacturing enterprises to reconsider their site selection decisions. Among these are: 1) a desire for simpler logistics emphasizing shorter transit distances and times; 2) a need to better protect intellectual property; 3) more reliable court systems; 4) incentives offered by the USMCA, America’s trade deal with Canada and Mexico; and 5) a recent set of subsidies offered under packages like the Chips and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act.

How Air Caster Technology Has Helped Improve Modular Building Manufacturing

Air casters mean flexibility, not just in terms of movement but also in terms of change. For example, one structure might be 56-feet-long and another 76-feet-long. Air casters allow manufacturers to easily accommodate a variety of shapes and sizes of boxes and then make changes on the fly.

The Building Industry Needs a Moonshot Speech

In his “Moonshot” speech in 1962, President Kennedy challenged his fellow citizens to land a man on the moon and bring him safely back to earth before 1970. He showed leadership, reimagining human potential and progress, and this famous speech has been an inspiration for many to get things done. Likewise, a “Home-shot” speech that challenges citizens to remove lengthy procedures and “carefully” remove some of the mountain of red tape required for permitting before 2030 would certainly make a huge difference.

How Issa Nesheiwat Conquered the Great Manufacturer/Design Divide

Born in Jordan forty years ago, Nesheiwat is something of an outsider to the modular housing world. His entrepreneurial spirit led him from a childhood growing up in Yonkers, New York, to the more provincial location of Poughkeepsie where he delved into many unique business ventures. Not one to shy away from a challenge, he took on projects that seemed impossible, often in the housing sector. His innate sense of the fundamentals in finance, corporate branding, and business expansion have led him to where he is today.