Skip to content

Collaboration — How to Do It Right

Collaboration in the Modular Construction Industry

Landon Boucher
Landon Boucher is the Director of Business Design and Innovations at MiTek Inc.

So much is said in the world of construction regarding the need to collaborate, particularly in off-site construction. Anyone experienced with successful project execution will tell you that good collaboration amongst project team members, will yield quantitative results. Some in our industry have taken the time to dive deeper into exactly what that means and the impact it can have on a project. What seems to be missing often from these presentations and marketing campaigns is real, tangible direction on, “how” – how to collaborate. I have witnessed many project teams miss the intended results of a project due to a poorly guided, albeit well intended, attempt at collaboration. Usually, these failed projects start with a lot of enthusiasm from the team members to share respective knowledge and insights in their aim toward a successful outcome. The definition of success can vary depending on the expectations laid out by the customer, but regardless of how its defined, success can subtly slip away from the team without a clear understanding of “how.”

There are several high-quality tools and resources on the market that can aid a team in their collaborative efforts, including some from MiTek regarding structural building components. Still, no matter how great these tools are, if little is understood about how to extract all capabilities from these tools and maximize outputs, even if improved results are seen, the full potential is missed. One obvious solution is including someone on the team who has advanced level expertise in this area. Sometimes however, that just isn’t available. In those cases, a representative from the company that developed and maintains that tool, is a necessary member to add, even if it is someone only available remotely to troubleshoot as needed. Still, even more important than understanding how to take full advantage of the capabilities available within the many tools and resources our industry provides, is an understanding of how to apply the general principles of collaboration. More than just another industry buzzword, collaboration is a process that requires leadership to maintain its implementation through project completion.

So how can you establish good collaboration? First you must determine what sort of collaboration your project will benefit from most. The two main types are Open and Closed. Open collaboration involves utilizing people from inside and outside your organization to generate ideas or solve problems. This type of collaboration usually involves a large number of participants. A common use of this type of collaboration would be market research. Closed collaboration, however, involves using a relatively small group of specialists working toward a common goal. Closed collaboration is what you would typically see on a construction project team. A relatively small group of specialists, working toward a common goal, to design, make and build a high performing building that produces a financial net gain for the owner.

Once you’ve defined the type of collaboration you will need, you must select the right people and begin building your team. Take careful consideration of the value of the work they provide, not just the bid. A good structural engineer for instance can spend twice the amount of time to complete a project but in that time, remove 100’s of 1,000’s of dollars from your construction budget. What matters more? The cost to design a project or the cost to build it? Even though in a collaborative environment, you want to have equal participation amongst all members of the team, it is important to still assign leadership roles to ensure the project stays on track. This is particularly important in our industry where the options can often seem endless regarding design choices and construction methodologies.

Now that your team is selected, its time to define your purpose. We can’t be successful in our “how” without defining our “why”. Share your mission and vision for the project and have it written down as the header of all communications going forward. A shared mission will keep the team together and a shared vision will help them arrive at the right destination.

Lastly, once the mission and vision have been identified, you will need to deliver it with conviction to generate buy-in from all participants. If you believe it, make it known and make it owned! As the leader of the project, you will need to set the example, build trust, and show consistency if you are going to be successful in establishing a creative and supportive culture that is rooted in the principals of collaboration.

I’ll share one final thought about leadership. While this article is focused on collaboration, the success of collaboration relies on leadership. Everything rises and falls on leadership! There is an old paradox known as Buridan’s Donkey. It’s named after the author, Jean Buridan who was a 14th century philosopher and a student of Aristotle. Buridan’s Donkey is an illustration of a paradox in philosophy regarding the concept of free will or the power to make choices. It refers to a hypothetical situation wherein a donkey that is equally parts hungry and thirsty is placed exactly midway between its food source and its water source. The paradox assumes that the donkey will always default to whatever is closest (or easiest to access). Ultimately, it dies of both hunger and thirst since it cannot make a rational decision between the food or the water. Jean Buridan was a great humorist and would regularly use humor to illustrate his philosophical teachings. While humorous, this paradox of the donkey, holds a lot of wisdom. We have all experienced the famous “analysis paralysis” dilemma on project teams. I think the point Buridan is making here in this paradox, is choices must be made. Sometimes, the easy choice isn’t the best. Regardless, you have to take decisive action. You have to move. You have to lead.

So, don’t be a donkey! Make decisions and lead your team to success through collaboration.

If you are interested in collaborating with MiTek, contact me at

More from Modular Advantage

Inside the Construction of 355 Sango Court

This year’s winner for Best of Show for Permanent Structures is 355 Sango Court, a 105,818 square foot affordable housing development manufactured by Nampa, Idaho based Autovol. The project team also included Prefab Logic for module design, Nibbi Brothers as the general contractor, Acc U Set Construction as the modular installer, and the overall project design was by David Baker Architects and DCI and Fard.

Aster Place by ROC Modular

Aster Place, a supportive housing building in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, won the Best of Show Award and Honorable Mention for relocatable structures in the social and supportive housing category at this year’s World of Modular conference.

Looking Back at the 2024 World of Modular

On March 18-21, the Modular Building Institute presented its 41st annual
convention and tradeshow, hosted again at the luxurious the Rosen Shingle Creek in Orlando, FL. Nearly 1,500 attendees from around the world gathered to learn, network, and find ways to expand both their businesses and the industry at-large.

Touring Japan’s Offsite Construction Industry: An Interview with James Haas, Offsite Construction Sales Manager for Nichiha

Nichiha USA, a premier provider of building envelope solutions and member of the Modular Building Institute (MBI), recently partnered with MBI for a trip to Japan to visit the Nichiha home office in Nagoya as well as several other offsite manufacturers around the country. Besides learning about different offsite building methodologies and systems, the trip was an excellent chance for both MBI and Nichiha to create closer ties with potential industry partners in Japan.

Modular Multi-family Construction: A Field Study of Energy Code Compliance and Performance through Offsite Prefabrication

Prefabrication in a factory setting may improve the performance of modular buildings compared to traditional site-built buildings. To validate this premise, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) funded a 3-year study from 2020-2023 comparing the energy performance of more than 50 modular and site-built multifamily buildings under construction in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Philadelphia and Seattle.

Inflation Comes in Hot to Begin ’24

Last year was a shockingly good one for the U.S. economy, at least relative to expectations. Coming into 2023, the conventional wisdom was that near-term recession was inevitable in America. In the face of belligerent excess inflation (above the Federal Reserve’s 2 percent mandate), monetary policymakers began ratcheting interest rates higher in March 2022. That process continued throughout the balance of the year and into 2023.

A Huge Win for the Modular Construction Industry in Massachusetts

In early February, 2024, the Massachusetts Board of Building Regulations and Standards (BBRS) released its proposed 10th Edition building codes. This draft included several amendments targeting modular construction that would have created an extremely difficult environment for the entire modular industry and could have eliminated the industry entirely in the state.

FEMA Announces Hawaii Housing Plan Using Modular Construction

Utah becomes the second state in the country, following Virginia, to fully adopt ICC/MBI standards 1200 and 1205. MBI will continue to work with leadership in Utah to implement the new program.

Supply and Demand: Solving Canada’s Housing Crisis One Relocatable Housing Unit at a Time

Not only do Moda Modular’s repurposed employee housing solutions cut the emissions related to construction down to nearly zero, but they also keep building materials that are often not biodegradable from slowly decaying in storage facilities.
It’s the classic environmental mantra of reduce, reuse, and recycle, scaled up and applied to building after building.

ICC/MBI Standards 1200 & 1205 Provide Foundation for Utah’s First-Ever State Modular Program

Utah becomes the second state in the country, following Virginia, to fully adopt ICC/MBI standards 1200 and 1205. MBI will continue to work with leadership in Utah to implement the new program.