AI for Plan Review
Smarter, Faster Code Checks Without the Guesswork
Rahul Bajaj, PE, MCP, is the Associate Director of Modular Plan Review, Central Region, at PFS TECO.
Everyone’s Talking About AI — Here’s What It Can Really Do for Plan Reviewers
You’ve probably heard the buzz — AI is everywhere. Tools like ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, and Google Gemini are being used for everything from writing emails to passing law exams. It seems like everyone is jumping on the AI train. But what can these tools really do for professionals in modular construction and plan review? Let’s break down how AI can be a powerful assistant — cutting down hours of code research, helping you prep for certification exams, and even expanding your understanding of the codes you work with every day.
AI: What It Is and Why It Matters
AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude are examples of what’s called “large language models” (LLMs). In simple terms, they’re trained on a massive amount of text from books, websites, and documents. They use this information to answer questions, summarize documents, and help generate ideas. Think of them as supercharged search engines that can talk back. The more specific your question, the more useful and relevant the answer can be.
How AI Helps with Code Compliance
Let’s say you come across something unfamiliar in a plan — this morning, for example, I reviewed a building with optional solar panels. I didn’t know which NEC sections applied off the top of my head. Rather than digging through the entire NEC table of contents, I asked AI:
Example prompt: “Which NEC 2020 sections apply to solar panel installation on modular buildings?”
Within seconds, it pointed me toward relevant sections like Article 690 (Solar Photovoltaic Systems) AI for Plan Review and gave me key concepts to look out for. I still reviewed the codebook myself — but AI saved me 30-60 minutes by showing me where to start.
AI Dos and Don’ts
Do: Use AI to Train Yourself and Your Team
Preparing for code certification exams? AI can quiz you.
Example prompt: “Write 120 multiple choice questions with answers based on 2021 IBC for the ICC Building Plans Examiner test. Make it a 2-hour exam format.”
You can use similar prompts for the IAPMO tests or state-specific exams like Wisconsin’s UDC Certification. You can even fine-tune the difficulty: “Make half the questions easy, a quarter medium, and a quarter hard.”
Don’t: Use AI to Skip the Code Book
AI is not a replacement for reading the code. It can be a shortcut to knowing what part of the code to read. If you’re citing something in your review comment or correction notice, verify it against the actual code language.
Do: Ask for Example Prompts Before You Use AI
Try these prompts:
- “What are the egress requirements for a modular dorm building under 2021 IBC?”
- “Give me a summary of key IECC 2015 requirements for factory-built buildings.”
- “How do I check compliance for ADA reach ranges inside a restroom module?”
Don’t: Upload Client Plans to Public AI Tools
Never copy-paste client plans, PDF files, or proprietary project info into ChatGPT, Gemini, or any other free/public AI tool. These tools do store your data and may be used to train future models.
Do: Talk to Your Company About Enterprise AI Access
If you’re serious about using AI at work, push your company to get an enterprise license. Enterprise versions (like ChatGPT Enterprise or Microsoft Copilot) offer data privacy and encryption.
Don’t: Trust AI Blindly
AI sometimes “hallucinates” and gives wrong answers. Always cross-check with the code. Treat AI like a junior coworker who’s fast but not always right.
Do: Use AI to Translate Code into Plain English
Not sure how to explain a code section to a client or team? Ask AI to paraphrase it in simpler language.
Example prompt: “Explain IBC 1010.1.1 in plain English for a non-engineer.”
Don’t: Assume AI Knows Local Amendments
AI tools often don’t include state or jurisdiction-specific amendments unless you provide them. Always double-check with your AHJ or local code supplements.
Do: Use AI to Translate Code into Plain English
Trying to understand what’s changed between 2015 and 2021 IBC? Ask AI to show you a comparison.
Example prompt: “Compare stairway requirements between 2015 IBC and 2021 IBC.”
Don’t: Use AI During Secure Exams
If you’re taking an online or in-person certification test, do not use AI or any external help. It’s unethical and could result in permanent disqualification.
Do: Log Prompts That Work Well
If a prompt gives a great answer, save it in a personal reference doc. Over time, you’ll build a library of prompts that improve your speed and quality.
Don’t: Use AI Output as Legal Code Interpretation
AI can summarize, compare, and guide — but it cannot interpret the law or code in an enforceable way. Always defer to the adopted code text and AHJ interpretations.
AI sometimes “hallucinates” and gives wrong answers. Always cross-check with the code. Think of it like an intern — fast, tireless, but not licensed. Use it to get started, not to finish your work.
AI for Managers, Not Just Reviewers
AI isn’t just helpful for individual plan reviewers — it’s also a valuable tool for managers overseeing review teams. You can use AI to:
- Create standardized checklists to improve consistency across reviewers
- Quickly train new hires with AI-generated quizzes and study guides
- Summarize complex code updates or memos into bullet points for your team
- Draft internal SOPs or review templates based on codebooks
Example prompt: “Write a standard operating procedure for reviewing factory-built restroom modules under 2021 IBC, IPC, and 2012 TAS.”
Extra Tip: Use AI to Summarize Lengthy Memos. Got a dense memo from the state AHJ or a long code update? Drop it in AI (if it’s not sensitive information) and ask: “Summarize this in bullet points in plain English.”
Outlook
AI tools are improving quickly. Already, some plug into BIM or CAD programs to check plans directly against code logic. Eventually, you might see plugins that pre-check submittals for local jurisdictional rules or that keep up with code updates in real time. As these tools evolve, modular professionals — especially those in plan review — stand to benefit the most, because our work is repetitive, rule-based, and data-heavy.
Final Thoughts
AI is here to stay — and it’s only getting better. It can’t replace your experience, judgment, or license. But it can save you time, make you more consistent, and help you level up faster. Think of it as a sidekick — not a threat.
More from Modular Advantage
From Model to Machine: Why Modular Scale Is Becoming a Software Problem, not a Material One
For modular manufacturers that have already secured demand and repeatable volume, the next major constraint may no longer be forming capacity itself. Increasingly, it is the continuity of the information feeding that capacity.
Who Will Define Modular Products for AI?
Artificial intelligence is making building configurators easier and less expensive to create. This makes urgent manufacturers’ need portable product definitions, stable identities, and shared interfaces regardless of how others’ software is produced.
From BIM to Robotic Production: A Digital Workflow for Customized Components in Volumetric Modular Construction
For volumetric modular manufacturers, the value of this workflow is not simply the use of robotics. Its real value is continuity.
Helping Build a Common Framework for Modular Construction in Canada
Canada’s modular construction sector continues to gain momentum, but scaling it successfully will depend on shared expectations across design, manufacturing, approvals, and project delivery. CSA Z251 helps provide that common foundation.
Edges, Exits & Equipment: A Modular Builder’s Guide to Rooftop Access
Rooftop access belongs in the factory design. Before the modules ship, the project team should identify each route’s users, confirm applicable requirements, coordinate with the roof system and structure, and assign responsibility.
When Timber Production and Modular Construction Share One System
As demand for multifamily and workforce housing continues to outpace what conventional construction timelines can deliver, models that reduce the number of handoffs between structural fabrication and modular assembly are likely to draw more attention.
Your AI Strategy Is an Enablement Strategy
Tools will change. Teaching employees only the steps in one platform creates a narrow capability. Involving them in problem definition, process mapping, data assessment, controls, and measurement gives the organization a way to improve its systems as technology evolves.
By-Right Permitting: The Missing Lever for Scaling Modular Multifamily
Modular has already proven it can outperform traditional building methods on speed and cost per unit. The next frontier is outside the factory in the front end of the process, where projects either clear a path to construction or get stuck in review.
Remote Inspections and The Future of Factory Oversight
Remote inspection is becoming a practical part of modular construction oversight. Its value is greatest when it is used selectively, governed by clear procedures, and supported by complete traceability.
Reimagining Dry-In: How a Temporary-to-Permanent Roofing Strategy Mitigates Risk Between Modular Installation and Final Roof Construction
As volumetric modular projects continue to increase in scale and complexity, the Temporary-to-Permanent FiberTite Roof System represents an example of how traditional trade scopes can be reimagined through Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) principles.